SABBATH DENIGRATION
by Avram Yehoshua

(Endnotes in red. Click on the number to go to endnote. Click the BACK button on your browser to return to the article)
In Matthew 24:20, Yeshua says: 'Pray that your flight will not take
place in winter or on the Sabbath.' Yeshua himself is acknowledging
the Sabbath well into the future. Also, we have to remember that even
though Yeshua said it at the time that He was in the midst of His
Apostles, the accounts of Matthew (Mark & Luke) weren't written until
around 60 A.D. 1 The Gospels therefore reveal what was important to
those believing communities at that time, many years after the death
and resurrection of Yeshua. If Sabbath had changed by then, the
Gospels would have reflected it. Since there is no indication of any
shift to Sunday assembly, or 'holiness' of the day (like the
Sabbath), we can safely say that the Sabbath and therefore the Torah
(Law) were still in effect for all believers.
It wouldn't be till around 100 A.D. that it would begin to be
replaced by the Church at Rome, which would become the Roman Catholic
Church, and also the church at Alexandria. They were the first to
rebel against God's Word in this area. But it wasn't for any alleged
theological reasons, although shameful theological notions would be
given as justification for Sunday over Sabbath.
The historical reason those churches severed themselves from Sabbath
and Torah was because in 70 A.D., the Temple in Jerusalem, along with
the entire city and one million Jews, was wiped out. The Roman
legions boxed in not only the inhabitants of Jerusalem, but doing it
at Passover of 68 A.D., they trapped many hundreds of thousands of
Jewish pilgrims from all over the Roman Empire, who were in
Jerusalem, for the Passover.
News of the Roman slaughter spread like wildfire among the Jews
throughout the Empire. Outraged and pierced to the heart at the
desecration of the Temple, the annihilation of the people and the
leveling of the City, many Jews rebelled and rioted. Rome crushed
them and began legislating persecutions, progressive taxes and other
anti-Jewish measures throughout their Empire. Gentile believers in
Rome and Alexandria, not wanting to get caught in the cross-fire,
bolted away from the most obvious sign of their linkage to the Jew,
the Sabbath. Fear of persecution by the Roman Empire (of being
counted with the Jews), was the major motivation for changing the
Sabbath to Sunday.
In order to justify the change of day, they had to have some
'theological' reasons to cover their flight from God's Word. The
Sabbath had to be denigrated and Sunday elevated. It would be
'proven' that the Sabbath was only given to the Jews because of their
stubbornness and sin, sort of as a curse, until Christ should come
and do away with it. For instance, in the Letter of Barnabas 2 (not to
be confused with Paul's companion),
'attempts to demolish the historical validity of Judaism by voiding
its historical events and institutions of their literal meaning and
reality' are presented. 'Though the covenant, for example, was given
by God to the Jews, 'they lost it completely just after Moses
received it' (4:7) because of their idolatry and it was never
reoffered to them.' 'Justin similarly by a tour de force establishes
a causal connection between the 'murdering of Christ and of His
prophets' by the Jews, and the two Jewish revolts of A.D. 70 and 135,
concluding that the two fundamental institutions of Judaism, namely
circumcision and the Sabbath, were a brand of infamy imposed by God
on the Jews to single them out for punishment they so well deserved
for their wickedness.'3
Of course the sheer absurdity that God withdrew His covenant from
Israel after their sins in the Wilderness, is fully proven false to
anyone who has read about Joshua's conquest of the Promised Land.
God's plans for Israel, for their good, are an integral part of the
Bible, from start to finish. But in a day when not many had access to
the Bible, it was easy for the 'leaders' to concoct these lies and
distortions and pass them on to their people. In another instance,
the Epistle of Barnabas attacks both the Jews and their God given
Torah:
'As a people, the Jews are described as 'wretched men' (16:1) who
were deluded by an evil angel (9:5) and who 'were abandoned' by God
because of their ancient idolatry (5:14).' 'As to the fundamental
Jewish beliefs (such as the sacrificial system, the covenant, the
promised land, the circumcision, the levitical laws, the Sabbath and
the temple) the writer endeavors to demonstrate that they don not
apply literally to the Jews, since they have a deeper allegorical
meaning which finds its fulfillment in Christ and in the spiritual
experience of the Christians.'4
Justin, in his Apologies and Dialogue with Trypho in Rome (about 148-161 A.D.)
5
'ignored the moral and corporal value of the Mosaic legislation, and
regarded the law, as James Parkes states, 'an unimportant portion of
the Scriptures, a temporary addition to a book otherwise universal
and eternal, added because of the special wickedness of the Jews.'6
As Justin speaks to Trypho of the reason why the Sabbath and Feasts
days were given to the Jews, he explains that they 'were imposed upon
you, namely, because of your sins and your hardness of heart.'
7
'While Paul recognizes the educative value of the ceremonial law,
Justin considers it 'in a negative manner as the punishment for the
sins of Israel.'
8
'The Sabbath then, according to Justin, is a temporary ordinance
deriving from Moses, enjoined to the Jews on account of their
unfaithfulness for a time, precisely until the coming of Christ.'
9
Isn't this what one might hear today from many Christians? It isn't
new. Of course, nowhere can one find any Scripture to substantiate
this denigration of God's Jewish people, His Sabbath or Law. But
these are some of the initial 'theological' reasons that clawed away
at the Sabbath and God's Law, to gave Christianity, Sunday and
Easter, etc. The time period was right after all the Apostles had
died. If they would have been alive, they would have rightly
condemned these Christian men.
Unfortunately, not much has changed in the Church since the Epistle
of Barnabas or Justin's works were written. Of course, this totally
misses that all the first believers in Jesus were only Jews, and that
until the spectacular inclusion of the first Gentile, Cornelius, in
Acts 10.
10 And that they all kept the Sabbath day holy (Acts 21:20).
Sunday Justification
The first 'positive' theological justification for Sunday that we
have comes from the Epistle of Barnabas. The writer introduces 'the
eighth day' concept as a way of 'one-upping' the 7th day Sabbath.
(For example, Jesus allegedly rose on the '8th day'.)
Sunday, which Barnabas 'designates as the 'eighth day,' is the
prolongation of the Sabbath of the end of time and marks 'the
beginning of another world' (15:8).'
11
Justin, like Barnabas, also uses the 8th day as the primary reason
for its priority over the 7th day 'Jewish' Sabbath. Even though they
both speak of the resurrection as happening on Sunday, the value of
the 8th day takes precedence over the resurrection. As W. Rordorf
states,
'the primary motivation for the observance of Sunday is to
commemorate the first day of the creation of the world and only
secondarily, in addition, the resurrection of Jesus.'12
Bacchiocchi writes that it
'is noteworthy that both Barnabas and Justin who lived at the very
time when Sunday worship was rising, present the resurrection as a
secondary motivation for Sunday-keeping, apparently because initially
this was not yet viewed as the fundamental reason. Nevertheless, the
resurrection of Christ' would 'emerge as the primary reason for the
observance of Sunday.'13
What Barnabas and Justin were trying to do was to show that the first
day of Creation was superior to the 7th Day Sabbath and could be seen
at the end of time as well. Unfortunately, there is no eighth day of
the week. There are only seven and then Sunday becomes again the
first day of the week, as at Creation. The 8th day though was a pagan
mystical concept that Barnabas and Justin 'borrowed' from paganism
that spoke of the end of time. It is not found in the Bible. But what
of the resurrection? Can that provide biblical justification for
Sunday?
Silent on Sunday
Viewing all the resurrection texts 'reveals the incomparable
importance of the event'
14 but
'it does not provide any indication regarding a special day to
commemorate it. In fact, as Harold Riesenfeld notes, 'in the accounts
of the resurrection in the Gospels, there are no sayings which direct
that the great event of Christ's resurrection should be commemorated
on the particular day of the week on which it occurred.'
15
'Moreover, the same author observes, 'the first day of the week, in
the writings of the New Testament, is never called 'day of the
Resurrection.' This is a term which made its appearance later.'
16
As interesting as the above two quotes are, they assume a Sunday
resurrection. What most don't seem to realize though, is that
although Yeshua was first seen on Sunday, the actual time and day of
His resurrection is not given in the New Testament (see
Mark 16:9 and the Resurrection for why Mark 16:9 doesn't help us with the day of the resurrection). In other words,
when the women got to the tomb and saw the angel, Messiah had already
been raised from the dead. The angel didn't say, 'He was just raised
before you got here', but that 'He has risen, just as He said.'
'He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the
place where He was lying.' (Mt. 28:6)
'And he said to them, 'Do not be amazed. You are looking for Yeshua
the Nazarene who has been crucified. He has risen! He is not here.
Behold! Here is the place where they laid Him.' (Mk. 16:6)
'He is not here but He has risen! Remember how He spoke to you while
He was still in Galilee'. (Lk. 24:6)
Although the writers may not have recorded exactly the words of the
angel, the essence is identical: Messiah rose from the dead. As to
time or day, the angel (and the rest of the New Testament), is
silent. Therefore, to think that Jesus rose on Sunday is an
assumption that cannot be verified by the New Testament. We believe
that Yeshua rose from the dead on Saturday afternoon, just a few
hours before, or near sundown, which would have been the Sabbath.
The Sabbath is one of God's great theological gems. It is the 'Crown
of His Creation', (it was made last but it was the only day that was
both blessed and called holy by God; Gen. 2:1-3). It is also the day
of Redemption or Salvation, a very fitting epitaph to the
Resurrection of Yeshua. In Deut. 5:12-15, the reason God gives for
keeping the Sabbath day holy is because He delivered Israel from
Egypt, and the Sabbath day was to typify or reflect that salvation
experience. For Yeshua to resurrect on Sabbath would coincide with
the Sabbath's two major themes of Creation and Redemption (see also
Ex. 20:8-11).
Yeshua Himself also gives us reason to believe that the Sabbath was
the day of His resurrection. He tells the Pharisees that the only
sign that the Son of Man would give them that He was the Messiah, was
the sign (or miracle, as 'sign' means in Hebrew), of Jonah:
'for just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of
the sea monster, so will the Son of Man be three days and three
nights in the heart of the Earth.' (Matt. 12:40)
That Jonah truly was three days AND three nights hidden in the whale
is attested in the book of Jonah:
'And Yahveh appointed a great fish to swallow Jonah and Jonah was in
the stomach of the fish three days AND three nights' (Jonah 1:17)
The importance of both the days and the nights gives us the time and
day of his resurrection. He would have to resurrect at the same time
he died or was buried, three days later. That's why it's impossible
for Yeshua to have been crucified on Friday night, as the Catholics
and many Christians maintain. For then, Yeshua wouldn't have been
raised till Monday evening, around sunset. We know He dies at 3:00 PM
(Mt. 27:45-46; Mk. 15:33-34; Lk. 23:44-46), and that He is buried by
sunset so, whenever one begins the counting of the three days and
three nights, one has to come to the same hour that He either died,
or was buried, three days later. A number of Christians opt for a
Thursday crucifixion but this too falls short of the 72 hours, for
His resurrection then would place it at sunset on Sunday. And since
we know He was raised by Sunday morning, it fails to meet the
criteria of Yeshua's words about the length of His time in the heart
of the Earth.
Wednesday though, which a minority of Christians support, gives us
three full days and nights. If Yeshua dies at 3 PM on Wednesday and
is buried by 6 PM, He would be raised either at 3 PM or 6 PM on
Saturday, which would still be the Sabbath. His appearance on Sunday
morning is not in doubt but to use this as a reason for Sunday over
Sabbath flies in the face of biblical reality as that Sunday was
known as First Fruits, and shows us what He did after His
resurrection.
It was the Sunday of Passover week (Lev. 23:9-14) and as such,
provides the reason why Yeshua tells Miryam (Mary), not to cling to
Him as He still needed to ascend to the Father (John 20:17). He would
be mirroring what the High Priest in the Temple was doing in offering
up the very first grain as first 'fruits' to God, that the rest of
the grain would be able to be eaten by Israel. God demanded that no
new grain (at the beginning of spring), could be eaten before the
first part of it was offered to Him (Lev. 23:14). In other words, the
first of the grain that would sustain Israel was first offered in
thanksgiving to God, then Israel could eat of it. Yeshua was first
raised from the dead on the holy Sabbath of God. This is the reason
why the Sabbath was made holy, it reflected Him. The grain, offered
as a thanksgiving to God on the Sunday of Passover week (again, the
theme of salvation), pictures Him as the First Fruits of the
Resurrection, and then after His resurrection, believers in Him could
partake of the Bread of Life, He having offered Himself to His Father
in thanksgiving.
17
These two facts, that no Scripture tells us that Jesus rose on
Sunday, and Yeshua's very words pointing to His Messiahship (three
days and three nights), blend together with both the Sabbath and
Passover as repositories of God's Salvation. They tell us that Yeshua
rose on God's holy Sabbath day.
They offer us a fuller understanding that the Sabbath and Passover
were not done away with, but on the contrary, were super-saturated
with the reality of Messiah Yeshua as our Savior. No one can have a
biblical problem with the celebration of one's birthday or the
anniversary of one's marriage. In this exact same concept, God calls
us to remember the Sabbath day and Passover as holy because it
commemorates not only His Creation of the world, and now the New
Creation through the Blood of Yeshua, but also the salvation of
Israel from Egypt by the blood of the lamb, and the salvation of
Israel (both Jew and Gentile believer), from the Kingdom of Satan, by
the Blood of the Lamb. How could anyone ever think that God's holy
Sabbath and Passover were done away with?
18 These are the reasons we
celebrate them. They honor and glorify the Lamb of God, and God has
commanded it.
Whether one believes Yeshua rose on Sunday or Sabbath is immaterial
to Sunday overpowering the Sabbath. First of all, there is nothing in
the New Testament to authorize Sunday as the day of assembly (Lev.
23:1-3), or holy (Gen. 2:1-3, Ex. 20:8-11, etc.), or made a day of
rest from one's work, to enter into God's Work (Heb. 4:9; Deut.
5:12-15). If Sunday cannot display any of these things that make the
Sabbath day special, how can it overwhelm the Sabbath and take its
place?
Second, for Sunday to obliterate the Sabbath of God, the New
Testament would have to contain explicit statements and theological
reasons for such an enormous shift of biblical reality. A passing
reference to Sunday cannot provide sufficient justification for
overturning the Sabbath.
Sabbath Among the Early Gentile Believers
Just a glimpse at Church history will reveal that Sunday did not come
immediately after the resurrection, or even within the first fifty
years:
'We have indications, however, that in the East' (modern day Turkey
and Syria where many churches were ), 'the substitution of the
Sabbath by Sunday worship was gradual since Jewish observances there
constituted, as A. P. Hayman points out, 'a perennial
attraction...for the Christian.'
19
In the 'Gospel of Thomas', written about 150 A.D. it states,
'(Jesus said): 'If you fast not from the world, you will not find the
kingdom; if you keep not the Sabbath as Sabbath, you will not see the
Father' (E. Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 1963, I, p. 514.'20
Also, the Martyrdom of Polycarp 8, 1, records that Polycarp's death
occurred on 'a festival Sabbath day.'
21 Polycarp died in 155 A.D.
These are just a small portion of what Church history records in
terms of those who 'obstinately refused' to follow Sunday, holding
unto God's Sabbath day.
Conclusion
In order for the Church of Rome to supplant the 7th day Sabbath of
Yahveh, it had to first denigrate it. This they did by saying that it
was only given to the Jews as a curse for their sins but that with
Christ, it would be done away with.
Sunday was made to appear as first in prominence, to justify it. This
they got from their perception of Creation Week. Unfortunately, they
left out that God made the 7th day then, before any Jews were around,
and elevated it to prominence, not Sunday. But this didn't phase them
because things can be said 'to be hidden until the time of Christ,'
when Sunday would take its alleged rightful place over Sabbath due to
it's mystic quality of being 'the 8th day'.
Although the resurrection, in the early post New Testament documents,
wasn't the primary reason used to elevate Sunday, it would soon
become so. Eventually, it would supersede both the negative arguments
of Jewish sin and the 8th day. But as we saw, the resurrection most
likely took place on the Sabbath, for both theological reasons
(creation and redemption), and also Yeshua's 'three days and three
nights' sign of His being the Messiah. Sunday therefore is very
suspect. Yet, even if it weren't, we noted that there was no
authorization whatsoever in the New Testament for Sunday claiming to
be a day that God wanted observed for any reason, resurrection or
otherwise.
22 Therefore, to place it in the position of God's Sabbath
is not only unjustifiable, it is actually sin:
Deut. 12:32: 'Whatever I command you, you must be careful to do. You
must not add to nor take away from it.'
'The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands
forever.' (Is. 40:8)
The Word of God must be our authority as to what God wants of us, how
He wants us to walk out this new life in Messiah Yeshua, not the
traditions of men that nullify His Word (whether Jewish or Christian
traditions).
Matt. 15:3: 'And He answered and said to them, 'Why do you yourselves
transgress the Commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?'
Matt. 15:7-9: 'You hypocrites! Rightly did Isaiah prophesy of you:
'This people honors Me with their lips but their heart is far away
from Me! But in vain do they worship Me, teaching as doctrines the
precepts of men.'
Most of Christianity has been entrapped by the theology of the
Catholic Church concerning God's 7th day Sabbath. It is not too late
to study the matter out and change one's thinking and behavior. This
is an indication that one is not only teachable, but also a follower
of the Messiah of Israel.
ENDNOTES:
1. R. T. France, M.A., B.D., Ph.D., Author; The Rev. Leon Morris,
M.Sc., M.Th., Ph.D., General Editor, Tyndale New Testament
Commentaries: Matthew (Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press,
2000), p. 29. And the account of John was written about 90 A.D.
(R.V.G. Tasker, Author and General Editor, Tyndale New Testament
Commentaries: John (Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity Press, 2000),
p. 20.)
2. Dr. Samuele Bacchiocchi, From Sabbath To Sunday (Rome, Italy: The
Pontifical Gregorian University Press, 1977), p. 218. The epistle is
dated between 130 and 138 A.D. It was 'written by a pseudonymous
Barnabas probably at Alexandria, a cosmopolitan cultural center where
the conflict between Jews and Christians was particularly acute.'
3. Ibid. p. 184. 'Cf. Dialogue 16, 1 and 21, 1.'
5. Ibid. p. 223-224, also note 31.
6. Ibid. p. 224. In note 32: 'James Parkes (fn. 19), p. 101; cf.
Dialogue 19 and 22.'
7. Ibid. In note 33: 'Justin, Dialogue 18, 2, Falls, Justin's Writings, p. 175.'
8. Ibid. Note 34: 'W. Rordorf, Sabbath, p. 37, fn. 1.'
10. 1To understand that Cornelius was the first Gentile to come to the
Jewish Messiah for salvation, we need only display Acts 11:18 which
is spoken by the Jewish Elders who believed in Yeshua, having taken
Peter to task for eating with Cornelius. After Peter explains what
God did, they say, 'When they heard this, they quieted down and
glorified God, saying, 'Well then, God has granted to the Gentiles
also the repentance that leads to life.' Their shock at a Gentile
believing in Jesus is evidence that Cornelius was the first to
believe, and this, about ten years after the resurrection.
11. Bacchiocchi, From Sabbath To Sunday, p. 271.
12. Ibid. p. 272. Note 6: 'W. Rordorf, Sunday, p. 220.'
14. Ibid. p. 75. Note 3: 'The resurrection of Christ is presented in
the New Testament as the essence of the apostolic proclamation, faith
and hope; cf. Acts 1:22; 2:31; 3:75; 4:2, 10, 33; 5:30; 10:40;
13:33-37; 17:18, 32; 24:15, 21; 26:8; 1 Cor. 15:11-21; Rom. 10:9;
1:1-4; 8:31-34; 14:9; 1 Thess. 1:9-10.' (Acts 3:75 must be a typo for
Bacchiocchi and refers to 3:15).
15. Ibid. Note 4: 'H. Riesenfeld, The Sabbath and the Lord's Day,' The
Gospel Tradition: Essays by H. Riesenfeld, 1970, p. 124.'
16. Ibid. Note 5: 'H. Riesenfeld, Sabbat et Jour du Seigneur, in A. J.
B. Higgins, ed., N.T. Essays: Studies in Memory of T. W. Manson,
1959, p. 212.'
17. For a fuller understanding of this, please see First Sheaf:
http://www.seedofabraham.net/feasts4.html
18. Bacchiocchi, From Sabbath To Sunday, p. 81. 'Epiphanius (ca. A.D.
315-403) suggests that until A.D. 135 Christians everywhere observed
Passover on the Jewish date, irrespective of the day
of the week.' (Note 20: 'Epiphanius, Adversus haereses 70, 10, PG 42,
355-356'. This tells us that not only the Sabbath was kept by Gentile
Christians (for if they kept the yearly Passover they certainly would
have kept the weekly Sabbath), but that also, Passover, unlike
'Easter Sunday' (which has no basis in Scripture), comes on any day
of the week. Christians for more than 100 years after the
resurrection kept God's Passover. This flies in the face of so called
theologians today who have theologized the Passover away. They have
done this not because this is what is in God's New Covenant but
because of their ignorance in interpreting God's Word and their lack
of experience in not observing Passover. They have never celebrated
Passover, having been taught from childhood in the Church, that it
was done away with. They therefore have come to God's Word with
false, preconceived notions about Passover and have gone about
presenting their views, not according to Scripture, although they use
Scripture, but according to their man-made traditions. Just like the
Sadducees who thought they knew the Word (Mt. 22:9; Mk. 12:24), they
too 'know the Word' but don't divide it rightly (2nd Tim. 2:15; 2nd
Peter 3:16). The same holds true for their 'understanding' of Sabbath
and the rest of Torah. It is very hard for Christians today, to think
of Sunday and Easter, etc., as traditions of men that nullify God's
Word, when they have been immersed in it from childhood. These
traditions become 'God's Word' to them and unless the Holy Spirit
opens their blind eyes, they remain captives of the Deceiver. What I
have seen is that when it comes to understanding that Torah is for
all of God's People today, the average Christian is just as blind to
this, as the average Jew is to Yeshua being Messiah. Both are
ensnared by Satan in these areas. Praise Yeshua for opening up blind
eyes in both Camps.
19. Ibid. p. 217, note 13: 'A. P. Hayman, ed., and trans., The
Disputation of Sergius the Stylite Against a Jew, CSCO 339, p. 75.'
'Sergius quotes them' (Christians), 'as saying: 'I will associate
partly with Judaism that I might hold on to the Sabbath' (22, 15, p.
77'). This is about 115 A.D.
21. E. A. Livingstone, The Concise Oxford Dictionary of the Christian
Church (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 458.
Polycarp, 69-155 C.E. Bishop of Smyrna, in modern day Turkey. He was
the leading believer of Messiah Yeshua in 'the Roman province of
Asia' (Turkey) 'in the middle of the 2nd century.' He was a famous
Gentile martyr who died for the Name of the Jewish Messiah, Yeshua.
It is believed that he was discipled by both the Apostles John and
Philip.
22. Interestingly enough, the Sunday of Passover week, known as First
Fruits, is not an annual Sabbath like the first day of Unleavened
Bread or the first day of the seventh month, etc. So one cannot use
the first appearance of Jesus on Sunday on First Fruits to even say
that Yeshua was first seen on an annual Sabbath. Pentecost (Shavuot),
however, seven weeks after First Fruits, is a Sabbath, the only
annual Sabbath that always occurs on Sunday. (Today, Judaism doesn't
view Shavuot as always falling on Sunday. They have misinterpreted
Lev. 23:15-16.
Email Avram